• HOME
  • HR Specialist
  • HR Online Products
  • E-letters
  • Forum
  • Store
  • About Mindy
  • Contact Us

Feb 21: Your Old Org Charts Can Help You Prevent New Lawsuits

Memories fade and employees come and go.

That’s why it’s crucial to retain certain records for future reference. Among the records you should keep forever are past organizational charts that show who had supervisory authority over other employees. As this case shows, they can come in handy in court.

Case in Point: Stephanie Goebelbecker filed a sex discrimination lawsuit, arguing that she was constantly passed over for promotions. Her smoking-gun evidence: She claimed her supervisor told her that she’d never be promoted because she is a woman.

The company’s response: That “supervisor” was not a supervisor at all. The company argued that the man who made the anti-woman remark really had no supervisory authority over Goebelbecker. So his comment couldn’t be used as evidence of job bias.

To prove its point, the company produced an organizational chart that showed no supervisory relationship. The problem: the org chart was dated Dec. 27, 2006. The year in question was 2002. The company didn’t retain its previous org charts. (Goebelbecker v. Plastipak Packaging, No. 1:06-CV-576, ND OH, 2007)

How did this case end … and what lessons can be learned?

In addition to the chart being outdated, the court noted other discrepancies with it. Therefore, the court ignored the chart as evidence of a lack of the supervisory authority. Despite this goof, the company still lucked out. The court dismissed Goebelbecker’s case for other unrelated reasons.

Still, those two big mistakes—a dumb comment by a supervisor and failure to retain old org charts—forced the company to spend more time and money than necessary to defend the case.

Lessons Learned … Without Going to Court

Lawsuits over lost promotions or firings can take years before they actually go to trial, even if employees have a relatively short time frame in which to make their original claims.

And because litigation often centers on work relationships and reporting authority, keeping old org charts can be helpful. It helps answer questions like: Was the person who allegedly discriminated or harassed employee a subordinate or a supervisor? Did that person have a significant say in promotions, demotions or firings?

Without clear records, you may not be able to explain to a court who was actually in charge and who was not.

Best bet: Print a dated copy of the organizational chart each time it is updated, and file the copy (electronically and in paper format).
Posted by Mindy Chapman in Discrim. & Harassment Comment: (1) Trackbacks: (0)

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

#1 - Cindy B.L. 2008-02-21 16:25 - (Reply)

How long do we have to keep the hard copies of the organizational charts?


Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA 1CAPTCHA 2CAPTCHA 3CAPTCHA 4CAPTCHA 5


 
 

Real-Life Employment Law Lessons ...
for People Who Don’t Want to Learn Them in Court.


Employment Lawyer Mindy Chapman, Esq. reviews the cases impacting you today, and gives you practical ways to protect your company.

New! 14-Day Free Trial – FREE Access to HR Articles, white papers. Try HR Specialist's Premium Plus Online today!

Sign up for the Case in Point e-Alert for weekly employment law updates and a FREE white paper!


HR Specialist: Online Products
FREE Bonus!
Order online subscription to HR Specialist today & receive $137 Legal Guide FREE


Polls

We've had employees ask for a chair or stool as disability accommodation:
Yes
No

Archives

Blog Post's Links

Bookmark this page!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Topic Categories

  • XML ADA
  • XML Age Discrimination
  • XML Discrim. & Harassment
  • XML ERISA
  • XML Employment Contracts
  • XML FLSA
  • XML FMLA
  • XML Labor Relations / Unions
  • XML Pay Discrimination
  • XML Privacy
  • XML Retaliation
  • XML USERRA

All categories

Archives

October 2008 (2)
September 2008 (4)
August 2008 (4)
Recent...
Older...

Calendar

Back October '08 Forward
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Recent Entries

Pull Up a Chair ... or a Lawsuit
Friday, October 10 2008

"Hey, Lady, It's a Man’s Job!"
Thursday, October 2 2008

Harassment Complainers: Are They ‘The Untouchables’?
Thursday, September 25 2008

The FMLA Calendar: Checkout Miss March!
Thursday, September 18 2008

Nix the Nicknames: 'Grandma' Will Get Even
Thursday, September 11 2008

Recent Comments

RE: "Hey, Lady, It's a Man’s Job!", by John A.Fri, 03.10.2008 16:30
Your tone is indicative of exactly what I’m talking about. This post is about someone being told that they’re not [...]


RE: "Hey, Lady, It's a Man’s Job!", by John A.Fri, 03.10.2008 07:34
I wish to make a strong clarification. I seem to have given the impression that the working conditions I describe [...]


RE: "Hey, Lady, It's a Man’s Job!", by twinkerbirdThu, 02.10.2008 17:25
i can’t “know” what your situation is. However, I’ve been an office support professional for many, many years, an [...]


RE: "Hey, Lady, It's a Man’s Job!", by Cheryl Fields, MBA, Ph.D. (ABD)Thu, 02.10.2008 17:22
I can remember not too long ago, when male flight attendants were ALL thought to be gay? And ALL female spo [...]


RE: "Hey, Lady, It's a Man’s Job!", by RThu, 02.10.2008 16:52
I have a hard time seeing where you fit what is going on. You weren’t fired or over picked for promotion based on [...]


Syndicate This Blog

XML RSS 0.91 feed
XML RSS 1.0 feed
XML RSS 2.0 feed
ATOM/XML ATOM 0.3 feed
ATOM/XML ATOM 1.0 feed
XML RSS 2.0 Comments

Other Useful Links

 

DISCLAIMER: the content contained in this blog is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. It is not designed to be and should not be relied upon as your sole source of information when analyzing and resolving a specific legal issue. Each fact situation is different; the laws are constantly changing. If you have specific questions regarding a particular fact situation, you should consult with competent legal counsel.


home | subscriber services | privacy statement | contact us
Copyright © 2007 NIBM. All rights reserved.