• HOME
  • HR Specialist
  • HR Online Products
  • E-letters
  • Forum
  • Store
  • About Mindy
  • Contact Us

Mar 27: Harassment's Tipping Point: Is the Magic Number 'More than Once'?

Sometimes it just seems like good old-fashioned ribbing between co-workers. But when does insensitive teasing turn into an illegal hostile work environment that violates Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act? One court said that while individual incidents may be viewed as singular events, courts will view all incidents “as a whole” when deciding if they add up to unlawful harassment.

Case in Point: Gloria Nieves was of Colombian origin and worked at a deli in Delaware. Her co-workers ridiculed her because of her limited English skills. They suggested that she knew a lot about drugs because she was from Colombia. They frequently joked about the status of her green card. She was allegedly called “stupid” by a co-worker. Another co-worker admitted that Nieves was called racial slurs behind her back and given the nickname of “Chihuahua.”

While Nieves complained to her managers, they took no action. Management even denied that Nieves ever notified them about the incidents, even though a co-worker testified that she overheard Nieves complaining at least once.

Nieves reported experiencing chest pains and crying spells because of all the comments. Eventually, she filed discrimination claims with the EEOC and state labor department and a lawsuit under Title VII for harassment based on national origin.

The deli responded by arguing that the co-workers’ conduct wasn’t severe enough to be unlawful under Title VII. That left the court with this question: How much harassment is enough to tip the scales into being unlawful? (Nieves v. Acme Markets Inc., D. Del., March 7, 2008)

How Did This Case End … And What Lessons Can Be Learned?

The court sided with Nieves and allowed the case to go to trial. It rejected the company’s argument that the harassment and discrimination was not severe enough to rise to the level of unlawfulness. The court said that if repeated acts of insensitivity were “taken as a whole,” a reasonable jury could find that they showed unlawful discrimination against Nieves. Critically, the court noted that some acts happened more than once.

The court relied heavily on the testimony of one of Nieves’ co-workers, who described the deli as "like in the 1960’s in a small town down South where everybody is racist."

3 Lessons Learned … Without Going to Court

1. Draw the line between teasing and harassment.

Supervisors may try to shrug it off as horseplay, ribbing or poor social manners. But the courts are now calling it harassment and discrimination. Train all employees on your anti-harassment policy and the consequences for violating it. No exceptions.

2. Promptly respond to all complaints.

Train your managers and supervisors that once they are on notice of a potential violation of your anti-harassment & discrimination policy , they’re required to take prompt, effective action to stop the conduct. Employers are then obligated to promptly investigate all claims.

3. Have a stricter policy.

Your anti-harassment & discrimination policy should be stricter than the law. That way, all "insensitive” conduct is strictly prohibited in the workplace. It’s always better to have stricter rules than to have to argue to the court that the conduct was not so “severe’ or so “pervasive” to be unlawful. It’s baloney to have to work in that kind of an environment today.
Posted by Mindy Chapman in Discrim. & Harassment Comments: (3) Trackbacks: (0)

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

#1 - Charlene Hernandez 2008-03-27 15:45 - (Reply)

You always have good lessons to learn. I only wanted to point out that her country is spelled “Colombia”, not “Columbia”.

#1.1 - mchapman@mchapmanassociates.com 2008-03-27 16:14 - (Reply)

Oops, thanks! I’ve fixed it on the site.

#1.2 - Lori 2008-04-04 13:37 - (Reply)

What was the outcome of this case for Ms. Nieves? Did she retain her job? Did the co-workers get fired? What was the deli held to? My daughter in law was just let go from a job after being the victim of harassment by a co-worker for six months. The co-worker called her names like ‘stupid’, hid her work, talked meanly about her to others when she was nearby etc. It reached a climax when the co-worker had her against a wall, was yelling at her and telling her she should quit. All along the supervisors have been aware of the issues and basically told them to learn to get along. After this last incident my daughter in law went to the boss and said that something needed done, she can’t continue to work with that co-worker being treated that way. The boss took that as a resignation and she lost her job on the spot. What is her re-course?


Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA 1CAPTCHA 2CAPTCHA 3CAPTCHA 4CAPTCHA 5


 
 

Real-Life Employment Law Lessons ...
for People Who Don’t Want to Learn Them in Court.


Employment Lawyer Mindy Chapman, Esq. reviews the cases impacting you today, and gives you practical ways to protect your company.

New! 14-Day Free Trial – FREE Access to HR Articles, white papers. Try HR Specialist's Premium Plus Online today!

Sign up for the Case in Point e-Alert for weekly employment law updates and a FREE white paper!


HR Specialist: Online Products
FREE Bonus!
Order online subscription to HR Specialist today & receive $137 Legal Guide FREE


Polls

We've had employees ask for a chair or stool as disability accommodation:
Yes
No

Archives

Blog Post's Links

Bookmark this page!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Topic Categories

  • XML ADA
  • XML Age Discrimination
  • XML Discrim. & Harassment
  • XML ERISA
  • XML Employment Contracts
  • XML FLSA
  • XML FMLA
  • XML Labor Relations / Unions
  • XML Pay Discrimination
  • XML Privacy
  • XML Retaliation
  • XML USERRA

All categories

Archives

October 2008 (2)
September 2008 (4)
August 2008 (4)
Recent...
Older...

Calendar

Back October '08 Forward
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Recent Entries

Pull Up a Chair ... or a Lawsuit
Friday, October 10 2008

"Hey, Lady, It's a Man’s Job!"
Thursday, October 2 2008

Harassment Complainers: Are They ‘The Untouchables’?
Thursday, September 25 2008

The FMLA Calendar: Checkout Miss March!
Thursday, September 18 2008

Nix the Nicknames: 'Grandma' Will Get Even
Thursday, September 11 2008

Recent Comments

RE: "Hey, Lady, It's a Man’s Job!", by John A.Fri, 03.10.2008 16:30
Your tone is indicative of exactly what I’m talking about. This post is about someone being told that they’re not [...]


RE: "Hey, Lady, It's a Man’s Job!", by John A.Fri, 03.10.2008 07:34
I wish to make a strong clarification. I seem to have given the impression that the working conditions I describe [...]


RE: "Hey, Lady, It's a Man’s Job!", by twinkerbirdThu, 02.10.2008 17:25
i can’t “know” what your situation is. However, I’ve been an office support professional for many, many years, an [...]


RE: "Hey, Lady, It's a Man’s Job!", by Cheryl Fields, MBA, Ph.D. (ABD)Thu, 02.10.2008 17:22
I can remember not too long ago, when male flight attendants were ALL thought to be gay? And ALL female spo [...]


RE: "Hey, Lady, It's a Man’s Job!", by RThu, 02.10.2008 16:52
I have a hard time seeing where you fit what is going on. You weren’t fired or over picked for promotion based on [...]


Syndicate This Blog

XML RSS 0.91 feed
XML RSS 1.0 feed
XML RSS 2.0 feed
ATOM/XML ATOM 0.3 feed
ATOM/XML ATOM 1.0 feed
XML RSS 2.0 Comments

Other Useful Links

 

DISCLAIMER: the content contained in this blog is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. It is not designed to be and should not be relied upon as your sole source of information when analyzing and resolving a specific legal issue. Each fact situation is different; the laws are constantly changing. If you have specific questions regarding a particular fact situation, you should consult with competent legal counsel.


home | subscriber services | privacy statement | contact us
Copyright © 2007 NIBM. All rights reserved.