• HOME
  • HR Specialist
  • HR Online Products
  • E-letters
  • Forum
  • Store
  • About Mindy
  • Contact Us

May 8: Which Industries are Exempt from Anti-Discrimination Laws?

That’s a trick question. The answer is none. Still, courts hear it all the time. “We’re an exception to harassment/discrimination laws because … We’re in a gritty industry …We’re doctors …. We have an extra-friendly workplace.” Whatever. One company just wrote a $1.5 million check trying that defense. It doesn’t work in 2008.

Case In Point: A group of black employees complained that they were subjected to racial harassment from co-workers at a power plant construction project in Massachusetts. The workers complained of racist graffiti, demeaning language and having their tools stolen.

The employees complained to the on-site project management team. But no action was taken and the graffiti was allowed to remain. Then it got worse. The complainers soon faced retaliation and eventually were fired.

The black employees filed a race discrimination and retaliation claim with the EEOC. The employer tried to shrug it off because construction sites are rough-and-tumble workplace. (EEOC v. Washington Group Int’l Inc., consent decree approved 3/17/08)

How did this case end … and what lessons can be learned?

The company eventually settled the case, distributing $1.5 million to about 20 employees. The EEOC warned that, “Even though a construction site may be viewed by some as a ‘rough and tumble’ workplace, discrimination is unlawful regardless of the job site. It doesn’t matter whether employees work behind a computer or behind a forklift.”

Ouch! In addition to writing the big check, the company must conduct anti-discrimination training, change its policies and procedures, post notices about the settlement at construction sites and be monitored by the EEOC for two years.

Double ouch! The EEOC also created a press release about the settlement and posted it on its Web site for all to see. What once was local news for newspaper readers is now available for the world to read in real time, all the time. Search engines will now always post the EEOC story when someone does a search on the company. That’s not the kind of press release any company can afford to have out there, even if they can afford to pay a settlement and the cost of defense.

Employers must be particularly aware of racial discrimination, the number one type of job-bias complaint in America. The EEOC has raised public awareness of race bias recently through its E-Race initiative.

3 Lessons Learned … Without Having to Go to Court

1. There are NO industry exceptions. I hear this misconception in my training all the time. But the EEOC clarified it for those who still don’t get it in 2008: There are no industry exceptions to harassment and discrimination laws. If that’s the best legal defense your attorney can use in court, you’re in trouble.

2. Train now, or be forced to train. Employers must train their managers and supervisors about their legal obligations. If you don’t do it proactively, you’ll be forced to do it with a lot of worldwide negative publicity. Don’t forget to train all employees on your policy. Everyone should know what conduct is acceptable and what is prohibited—plus the consequences for violating the policy.

3. Tie your policies to performance. Managers and supervisors who do not stop the conduct and immediately report it should suffer employment consequences themselves. They must also monitor the workplace for graffiti, e-mails, cartoons etc. and immediately remove such items as soon as they see them. Next week is too late—the EEOC may have the case on its desk by then.

Posted by Mindy Chapman in Discrim. & Harassment Comment: (1) Trackbacks: (0)

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

#1 - Louise 2008-05-13 15:36 - (Reply)

Three cheers for the EEOC. It’s people like the “rough and tumble” who keep discrimination alive and cause irreversible damage. It’s hard to believe that there are still individuals today with the mentallity of a snake. From a White Non-prejudice American.


Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA 1CAPTCHA 2CAPTCHA 3CAPTCHA 4CAPTCHA 5


 
 

Real-Life Employment Law Lessons ...
for People Who Don’t Want to Learn Them in Court.


Employment Lawyer Mindy Chapman, Esq. reviews the cases impacting you today, and gives you practical ways to protect your company.

New! 14-Day Free Trial – FREE Access to HR Articles, white papers. Try HR Specialist's Premium Plus Online today!

Sign up for the Case in Point e-Alert for weekly employment law updates and a FREE white paper!


HR Specialist: Online Products
FREE Bonus!
Order online subscription to HR Specialist today & receive $137 Legal Guide FREE


Polls

We've had employees ask for a chair or stool as disability accommodation:
Yes
No

Archives

Blog Post's Links

  • E-Race
  • EEOC v. Washington Group
    Int’l Inc.

Bookmark this page!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Topic Categories

  • XML ADA
  • XML Age Discrimination
  • XML Discrim. & Harassment
  • XML ERISA
  • XML Employment Contracts
  • XML FLSA
  • XML FMLA
  • XML Labor Relations / Unions
  • XML Pay Discrimination
  • XML Privacy
  • XML Retaliation
  • XML USERRA

All categories

Archives

October 2008 (2)
September 2008 (4)
August 2008 (4)
Recent...
Older...

Calendar

Back October '08 Forward
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Recent Entries

Pull Up a Chair ... or a Lawsuit
Friday, October 10 2008

"Hey, Lady, It's a Man’s Job!"
Thursday, October 2 2008

Harassment Complainers: Are They ‘The Untouchables’?
Thursday, September 25 2008

The FMLA Calendar: Checkout Miss March!
Thursday, September 18 2008

Nix the Nicknames: 'Grandma' Will Get Even
Thursday, September 11 2008

Recent Comments

RE: "Hey, Lady, It's a Man’s Job!", by John A.Fri, 03.10.2008 16:30
Your tone is indicative of exactly what I’m talking about. This post is about someone being told that they’re not [...]


RE: "Hey, Lady, It's a Man’s Job!", by John A.Fri, 03.10.2008 07:34
I wish to make a strong clarification. I seem to have given the impression that the working conditions I describe [...]


RE: "Hey, Lady, It's a Man’s Job!", by twinkerbirdThu, 02.10.2008 17:25
i can’t “know” what your situation is. However, I’ve been an office support professional for many, many years, an [...]


RE: "Hey, Lady, It's a Man’s Job!", by Cheryl Fields, MBA, Ph.D. (ABD)Thu, 02.10.2008 17:22
I can remember not too long ago, when male flight attendants were ALL thought to be gay? And ALL female spo [...]


RE: "Hey, Lady, It's a Man’s Job!", by RThu, 02.10.2008 16:52
I have a hard time seeing where you fit what is going on. You weren’t fired or over picked for promotion based on [...]


Syndicate This Blog

XML RSS 0.91 feed
XML RSS 1.0 feed
XML RSS 2.0 feed
ATOM/XML ATOM 0.3 feed
ATOM/XML ATOM 1.0 feed
XML RSS 2.0 Comments

Other Useful Links

 

DISCLAIMER: the content contained in this blog is general information and should not be construed as legal advice. It is not designed to be and should not be relied upon as your sole source of information when analyzing and resolving a specific legal issue. Each fact situation is different; the laws are constantly changing. If you have specific questions regarding a particular fact situation, you should consult with competent legal counsel.


home | subscriber services | privacy statement | contact us
Copyright © 2007 NIBM. All rights reserved.